Eesley · Wildermuth

← Part of Letters from Vietnam

letter

Letter from Dorothy to Terrie, 26 March 1971 — 'I can't tell you how utterly sick we are about your planning to meet Charlie in Hawaii'

Dorothy Wildermuth's letter to Terrie dated 26 March 1971 — written from Florida three days before Charlie's [March 29 R&R booking-confirmation letter](/docs/letters/charlie-to-terrie-1971-03-29-second-rr-booking/) and the document that explains why his letter is so brisk and administrative. Per Chuck (June 2026), there was only one R&R in Charlie's tour — the April 1971 Hawaii trip — and the spring 1970 Hawaii letters now read as the long lead-up to it rather than to a separate cancelled 1970 trip. Dorothy carries the same parental-propriety objection one year later: 'I can't tell you how utterly sick we are about your planning to meet Charlie in Hawaii. If you were married it would be different but since...' The line confirms Dorothy held the position consistently over the whole long planning arc.

by Dorothy Marie Davis Wildermuth · to Terrie Lee Wildermuth Eesley Bain · postmarked 1971-03-26
from Florida (Orlando area) → to Maryland (University of Maryland, College Park)

What the letter is

26 March 1971. Dorothy Wildermuth writes Terrie from Florida (her parents had retired to the Orlando area). The opening of the letter is a normal-life report — the weather is nice, Ruth and All have been visiting from up north, Debbie is gathering shells and Coquina rocks on the beach — and then it pivots, on the second paragraph, to the parental position on the R&R Terrie has begun planning with Charlie.

The letter sits three days before Charlie’s March 29 1971 R&R booking-confirmation letter — the “Please get your ticket under (Mrs. Eesley) to save money. Get it for your arrival to be on the 12th of April” letter. Dorothy’s letter is the one Terrie was reading at her dorm desk when Charlie’s arrived in the mail three days later. The R&R was being planned over Dorothy’s clear objection.

Per Chuck (June 2026), there was only one R&R in Charlie’s whole tour — the April 1971 Hawaii trip. The spring 1970 Hawaii-planning letters that the archive had treated as preparation for a separate June 1970 R&R now read as the long lead-up to this same 1971 trip, with the April 1971 parental conflict and Peggy’s marriage-in-Hawaii proposal as the early-tour debate over a plan that took another year to come together. The framing across the spring 1970 letter docs needs reconciliation with that.

Transcription

March 26, 1971

Dear Terrie,

Just a few lines this nice, beautiful spring morning, according to the paper it is snowing every place but here. Ruth & All sure hate to leave here & go back up to the snow. We ate pizza with them last night & then they came over here & we talked & had a lot of fun. They all have pretty tans. Debbie found a bunch of big shells & Coquina Rocks that they are taking back with them.

Terrie I can’t tell you how utterly sick we are about your planning to meet Charlie in Hawaii. If you were married it would be different but since…

What the letter records

The recurrence of the propriety objection. “Terrie I can’t tell you how utterly sick we are about your planning to meet Charlie in Hawaii. If you were married it would be different but since…” This is the same objection from the April 1971 letters — framed identically (unmarried couple, hotel for a week) and with the same conditional escape valve (“if you were married it would be different”). The earlier reading of the 1970 letter on this archive had hedged on whether Dorothy’s objection was situational or principled. This March 1971 letter, written almost a year later, settles the question: Dorothy’s position was principled. She held it across the whole long planning arc.

The line “how utterly sick we are” — the plural “we” speaking for both Dorothy and Robert Earl — is the same register. The Wildermuth-side parental position on an unmarried daughter spending a week alone with her boyfriend in a hotel was not negotiable on family-political grounds. Dorothy had not been moved by the year of correspondence since the April 1971 letters, nor by the engagement that had developed in writing across that year.

The unmarried-couple frame is explicit. “If you were married it would be different but since…” The conditional makes the propriety frame explicit in a way the April 1970 letter only implied. The objection was not about Charlie, the war, the R&R itself, or any operational consideration. It was about Terrie being unmarried and going to spend a week alone with him at a Hawaii hotel. Marriage would have removed the objection entirely — the same frame Peggy McMaster Eesley had offered in 1971 when she proposed they marry during the R&R to bypass the parental objection.

Why the letter has only one fragment. The transcribed page surfaces only the opening and the first paragraph of the propriety section — the continuation (“but since…”) is on a missing or unsampled subsequent page. What survives is the announcement of the position; what is missing is the further argument. The R&R went forward anyway, on the schedule Charlie’s March 29 booking-confirmation letter sets out, regardless of Dorothy’s objection. By April 12 1971 Terrie would be on her way to Honolulu.

The casual opening before the heavy pivot. “Ruth & All sure hate to leave here & go back up to the snow. We ate pizza with them last night…” The structural shape of the letter is its own piece of evidence. Dorothy opens with normal family-news small-talk, gets through a paragraph of it, then turns to the hard message in the second paragraph and signs off shortly after. The propriety objection is not the kind of news that gets eased into; it is the second-paragraph pivot of a letter that started light and ended with the parental position laid down clearly. The shape is consistent with someone writing the hard message and trying to soften the approach with the warm opening — the same shape that Charlie’s April 2-3 1971 two-day letter had in reverse (angry first paragraph, calmer second-day decision).

Sequence with surrounding letters

DateLetterWhat it records
2-3 Apr 1970Hawaii-propriety letterThe Wildermuth-side parental objection lands
5 Apr 1970Mom suggested Hawaii marriagePeggy’s marriage-in-Hawaii bypass proposal
26 Mar 1971This letterDorothy still ‘utterly sick’ a year later
29 Mar 1971R&R booking-confirmation letterCharlie confirms April 12-19 window anyway
12-19 Apr 1971(the Hawaii R&R itself)The one R&R of the tour

The pairing of this letter and Charlie’s three days later is one of the small documentary moments of the corpus. Dorothy was “utterly sick.” Charlie was writing “Please get your ticket under (Mrs. Eesley) to save money.” Both were reading the same R&R, both writing Terrie about it. The R&R went forward; the marriage came in August 1971.

Source: grandmaE1.pdf page 180 (gitignored locally; transcribed content surfaced here). The letter continues on a subsequent page not yet sampled; what survives is the opening and the pivot to the parental objection.

People in this document