📖 本页含中文版本 — 点此跳至中文 ↓  ·  This page has a Chinese version below.

Can one tell where he’s going until he knows where he’s been?

— Robert Earl Wildermuth, epigraph to the Wildermuth/Fleming Heritage, 1 January 1990

What this essay is doing

Most of what’s in this archive is the what — names, dates, places, photographs, the Vietnam letters, the eulogies, the memoirs, the photo deck. What follows is a pass at the why: a reading-across of the archive for the values, practices, and lessons that show up on more than one page and across more than one generation — the threads, in other words, that the family has actually handed down.

A note on method. None of these threads is a claim about every individual. Each is named because at least three generations of evidence in this archive point at it, and because the pattern — not any single instance — is recognizable as a thing the family did and is still doing. They are listed in the order that struck me reading back, not by importance.

1. Education as inheritance

The most-cited thread, and the one with the cleanest cross-generational lineage. Robert Earl Wildermuth took his Stanford BA in Biological Sciences on the GI Bill in October 1948 — the first Stanford degree in the family. He carried that valuation forward through his Pentagon career, into retirement-era genealogy research, and explicitly into his children’s upbringing. When Terrie committed me to Duke before the cost question had been settled, her line was “don’t worry, I will find a way” — the same thread, one generation on. The MIT PhD in 2009 is the next bookmark; the Stanford faculty appointment is the present one. In the same generation, my first cousin Briana (Massaro) Lockett — Robert Earl’s granddaughter through his youngest daughter Debbie — is a physician’s assistant at Stanford, putting two of his grandchildren on the same campus he arrived at by used 1939 car in 1947. Three generations of the same family at Stanford across seventy-five years. The “never felt inferior” line from his memoir was, in the end, a long-form prediction. On the Eesley side: Peggy McMaster Eesley went to Penn State at seventeen, graduated in 1936, taught Home Economics at Marietta High School. Her investing wisdom “paid for a large part of my education,” per the eulogy for Charlie. On the Zhou side: Lijie 周丽婕 found Stanford too; Chuck at the 清華園 gate of Tsinghua is the Chinese counterpart in the same frame.

The lesson the family lived is not just “go to school.” It is that education is a structural inheritance — something one generation builds with money, time, and patience so that the next can take it for granted.

2. Patience and the long view as a moral practice

Most clearly named in Peggy’s investing: “her wisdom, far-sightedness and patience in investing inspired him to become a stockbroker, funded my grandparents’ travel in retirement, and paid for a large part of my education.” The eulogy says it plainly: she was the figurehead. But the pattern is wider. Peggy’s bridge in her later decades was the same McMaster patience-and-strategy running on cards instead of capital. Robert Earl’s eighteen-year genealogical research arc (1971–1989) is the historical-research version: he wrote the burgermeisters of Marbach, Pleidelsheim, and Rielingshausen and got three negative replies; turned to the LDS records in Salt Lake City and found a fourth village; wrote that mayor; the mayor passed his letter to a city genealogist; the genealogist checked the parish records and confirmed Johann Michael had been born in Großaspach. Then three years of Philadelphia correspondence before an unexpected August 1986 letter informed him the naturalization had actually been filed in New York. Eighteen years of methodical letters and counter-letters became one printed binder on 1 January 1990, dedicated to his parents and his wife. Terrie’s twenty-three years in the Marietta City Schools, with the late-night studying after long teaching days, is the same practice in classroom form. Charlie’s stockbrokering. Will’s architectural practice. My own decade-plus into the PhD and now the long climb of building this archive.

The deeper lesson is not “compound your money.” It is that the slow thing, done well, for long enough, is what actually moves the needle in a family’s life. Money is one register. Education is another. So is genealogy. So is teaching. So is bridge.

3. Writing things down because someone in the future will need to know

Robert Earl closed his last manuscript by addressing himself to “future genealogists” — the line that, almost more than any other in the archive, names the project the rest of the family has actually been doing. His memoirs and his combat log are the canonical examples. But the pattern goes much wider. Mary Eesley Bean wrote the 1985 Eesley Family History that is the relationship backbone of this site. Maggie Eesley built the “Four Generations of the Eesley Family” photo deck that became this archive’s paternal image layer. Will Eesley drew the 1942 ration-card Christmas card and the cover of Bean’s family history in his own architect’s hand. Terrie kept Charlie’s Vietnam letters — without her preservation, none of that collection would exist. I’m building this site. Each generation, in its own medium, produces a document for the next one. Calling this a value — and not just a habit — lets the current generation’s archive-building be seen as the continuation of an unbroken inherited practice.

The lesson: the present generation owes a record to the next one, and the form the record takes is much less important than the fact of its being made.

4. Returning to the places that matter — pilgrimage as family form

Robert Earl’s November 1993 pilgrimage to Rielingshausen and Marbach is the founding instance — he went back to the German villages the family had left in the 1840s and brought home photographs and a typed travelogue explaining what he had found. Twenty-six years later, I went back to the same villages with Lijie and made the interior pictures Robert Earl had been intimidated out of making by the old cleaning woman. The same year we also did the Hanwell and Old Stratford pass on the Eesley side — and in 2019, Lijie and I made the three-frame echo at the Lingyin Temple gate in Hangzhou, where her parents had stood for their honeymoon in 1982. The 1965 Stanford family return visit — Dottie and the four Wildermuth kids at the White Memorial Fountain — is an earlier instance of the same pattern, before any of us were old enough to formalize it.

The archive’s entire “then-and-now pair” structure — every place page in the places/ collection holds a pairs block in its schema for exactly this — is the architectural expression of this thread. Returning to places is what the family does; the archive simply made the practice into a data field.

The lesson: going back is itself a form of remembering, and worth the airfare.

5. Service, stewardship, and giving — civic, military, faith-grounded, sustained across the generations and now bilateral

This thread has two faces that are really one practice. The time face is service: spending your hours on institutions outside your own household. The resource face is stewardship: looking after money, attention, and faith-grounded structures that are not first about yourself. In the family record they appear together more often than they appear separately. I’ve named them as one thread for that reason.

The military service record is the most cited dimension. Robert Earl Wildermuth flew B-24s over Biak, Leyte, and Mindoro in 1944–45, came home, finished Stanford, served Korea, served the Pentagon, retired a lieutenant colonel. Charlie shipped to Saigon in 1969 and rotated out in 1971; the year shaped him for the rest of his life. Lyle Eesley died as a POW at Cabanatuan in 1942.

The civic service record is wider and more sustained. Will Eesley sat on Marietta’s Tree Commission and Bicentennial Commission, was past president of the Kiwanis Club, sat on the Betsey Mills Advisory Board. Peggy was active in PEO, the Betsey Mills Club, the Junior Reading Club. Terrie taught twenty-three years in the Marietta City Schools and ran Safety Town in summers — the closest thing to a civic-service-as-vocation in the lineage.

The faith-grounded stewardship record runs straight through First Congregational United Church of Christ in Marietta, the institution that has functioned as a family seat across four generations:

• Will served on the church’s business committee for many years — the architect’s hand applied to the church’s administrative life.
• Peggy was director of Christian education at First Congregational and a member of the Dana Philathia Class for years — the faith-and-education join in one role; she ran the program that taught the church’s children.
• Charlie sat on the church board and helped manage the church’s endowment funds — bringing the stockbroker’s hand to the church’s financial life, applying the same investing discipline his mother had taught him to a pool of money that wasn’t his own and wasn’t meant to be. Stewardship in the literal sense: looking after something you do not own. He also “believed strongly in the responsibility of voting,” which is its civic-life counterpart — same posture, different institution.
• Charlie’s memorial service was held in the same First Congregational sanctuary with the Rev. Linda Steelman officiating — the same minister who had buried Peggy nearly a decade earlier. The church that had been the family’s giving home was also the building where the family’s losses were named.

The act of Charles Leonard Eesley bringing Stella from Hawaii into the Bexley household during WWII reads in this thread too — a faith-grounded act of selfless refuge for a young person who was not a blood relative and was at real risk on the West Coast. Stewardship of another person’s life. “Sent macadamia nuts back from Hawaii for years” is the rest of that thread told from her end.

In the present generation, the practice has gone global and bilateral. Lijie and I founded the Zhou & Eesley Family Foundation in January 2021 — a private family foundation supporting computer science and entrepreneurship education in communities mainstream programs overlook. The Foundation’s stated commitments — “We follow the partners, not a template. We support, we don’t extract. We invest as well as grant” — are the exact posture Charlie used in managing the First Congregational endowment, just at a different scope.

Five years in, the work has reached eight communities — Molokai, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Tanzania, Uganda, the MIT MEET program in Jerusalem, and the founding partnership at San Francisco State University — with Paris and the Philippines added more recently. The 2025 Penang program alone trained ~25 teachers reaching ~2,500 students — a 100:1 multiplier per teacher. Across the Foundation’s work and the Stanford and online courses we teach, our co-founders have reached more than 200,000 students globally.

The continuity is exact in its underlying logic, even with the form translated:

• Faith in the Eesley generations was Congregational Christianity — a particular tradition with particular sanctuaries. In the present generation it has widened to faith in education itself as the most durable form of selfless giving, across religions and political lines (the MEET program brings together Israeli and Palestinian students; the work in Tanzania, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Uganda crosses every major faith the families involved practice).
• Stewardship was the church endowment — running money you do not own toward the long-term welfare of an institution you serve. The Foundation runs the same practice at wider scope: mission-related investments alongside grants, “following the partners, not a template” in exactly the spirit Charlie used to manage the church endowment for the next generation of Marietta’s congregation.
• Selfless service in the Eesley generations was Peggy teaching the church’s children for years, Charlie on the board for years, Will on the business committee for years. In the present generation it is Lijie’s four-month ASPIRAS AI cohort with fifteen Malaysian non-profits, “long-term relationships with the people doing the work on the ground,” and the explicit Foundation commitment to “support, not extract” — not to brand the work, not to take credit.

Robert Earl, on the Wildermuth side, expressed the same impulse differently: his retirement spent teaching and researching the family back to the early 1700s in Württemberg was an act of unpaid stewardship of the family’s record itself — a different object of care, but the same posture toward giving without expecting return.

The Foundation’s tagline — “Education in the places that need it most” — is the same sentence Peggy might have written about her work at First Congregational, just scaled up by a few orders of magnitude and made bilateral.

The lesson: you owe the wider world some of your time and some of what you have been entrusted with — and the form doesn’t have to be the wall in Washington. It can be the church endowment, the Safety Town summer, the Bicentennial Commission, the vote, the Foundation, the four-month cohort. The resources you hold — money, time, attention, faith — were given to you in trust by people you cannot pay back. The way you pay them back is by passing what you have to people who can’t pay you back either.

6. Humor — especially dry, especially under hard things — as a transmitted inheritance

Peggy’s “dark, dry sense of humor went directly to her son Charlie, who passed a more diluted version” to me — this is the most explicit cross-generational naming of a single trait anywhere in the existing pages, and it is in Charlie’s eulogy in my own words. Charlie’s “smart-ass comments that probably nearly got him court-martialed” in Saigon are the war-zone version. My own “That’s why I had to become a professor where the bar for being funny is sufficiently low” is the academic-life version. Peggy’s obituary closes by remembering “her optimistic outlook and ready smile.” Terrie’s “Please don’t cry for me” poem faces death with grace and humor in eight lines.

The pattern is identical: humor, particularly dry, is the family’s primary tool for getting through the hard things — war, illness, the late stretch of a parent’s life, the embarrassments of being alive at all. It is not a deflection. It is the form the family’s care takes when sentiment would feel false.

The lesson: the joke is allowed at the funeral, and probably should be.

7. Showing up — in small, daily, unglamorous ways

This is the thread that takes the most pages to see, because no single instance is dramatic. Charlie visiting Peggy at Harmar Place every day after work in her final stretch. Me doing homework at Peggy’s after-school every weekday through my childhood, the two of us at dinner with my dad once or twice a week. Stella Sunn brought from Hawaii into the Eesley household during the war to keep her clear of the West Coast internment camps — she stayed, married Ted, raised SueLynn and a son, “sent macadamia nuts back from Hawaii for years.” The Wolfes named in Terrie’s obituary as “close relatives by way of long entertainment of visiting family.” The Arnolds a hundred yards from the Highland Ridge house but “a thousand times closer than that in practice” — John Arnold helping Charlie up after the tractor flipped on him.

The pattern is kinship as a practice rather than an identity. The people who count in this family count because of the dinners, the after-school hours, the hospital visits, the macadamia nuts in the mail, the neighbor who comes when the tractor flips — not because of the blood relationship per se.

The lesson: show up regularly for the people you love, and the people you love will widen to include the ones you keep showing up for.

8. Place-and-language as a durable, multi-generational curiosity — Japan and China

The seventh thread (showing up) is about who. This one is about where. The family has, across at least three generations, returned again and again to the same two countries — Japan and China — not as tourists but as inhabitants, students, language-learners, researchers, and in-laws. The pattern is more sustained than vacation; it reads as a real cultural commitment.

On the Japan side, the thread runs through three generations explicitly named on my own person page:

• Robert Earl and Dottie Wildermuth were posted at Itazuke Air Base in Fukuoka from 1965 to 1968 — the three-year tour that produced Robert Earl’s career-defining squadron turnaround and gave my mother Terrie the high-school years in Japan named in her 2017 obituary: “Terrie traveled the U.S. and Japan until graduating high school.” The high school graduation photograph is the closing image of that childhood.
• On the Eesley side, Will and Peggy had also traveled to Japan — when the Wildermuth and Eesley families first met (around Charlie and Terrie’s courtship), the conversation found its way to Japan because all four parents had traveled there and shared an interest in the country. The shared Japan thread was one of the first common cultural notes between the two in-law families.
• I teach one week each summer at Kobe University and have published research on entrepreneurship in Japan — the continuing third-generation expression of an interest that has been in the family since the 1960s.

On the China side, the thread is younger but moving the same way. Lijie was born in Qingdao — the Yellow Sea port city whose central plan was laid out by the German Empire in 1898 — and grew up in the German-concession quarter with St Michael’s Cathedral at the end of her elementary-school block. Her parents’ 1982 honeymoon at Lingyin Temple in Hangzhou is the Zhou side’s founding pilgrimage image; she and I went back in 2019 and made the matching frame at the same gate, with my own frame at the 清華園 (Tsinghua University) main gate on a separate Beijing trip as the closest Chinese counterpart to my Stanford appointment. The Zhou-side pages of this archive carry 中文 sections on every entry — the practice of making the family record itself bilingual, rather than translating it later, is the data-model version of the same value.

Two countries, three generations on the Japan side, two on the China side, and the same posture in both cases: the family inhabits these places rather than visits them. They are not foreign in the family’s life; they are second and third homes.

The lesson: the world is a much smaller place when you keep going back to the same parts of it, and the curiosity that drives that going-back compounds across generations as durably as Peggy’s investing did.

9. Crossing — moving for what’s next, across continents and generations

This is the structural counterweight to thread #4. The pilgrimage thread is about going back; this one is about going forward. Both are present in every generation of the archive, and both are values, not contradictions.

The family record literally begins with founding emigrations:

• Johann Michael Wildermuth sailed from Großaspach, Württemberg in 1847, age sixteen — per his own 1853 Philadelphia naturalization petition. He worked the shoe trade in Marietta and is buried at Oak Grove Cemetery. He was the Wildermuth who left.
• John F. Eesley crossed from Old Stratford, Warwickshire to America in the 19th century, founded the Sunshine Flour Mill in Plainwell, Michigan at the end of that crossing, and put the family surname onto the National Register of Historic Places. His brother Albert Robert Eesley made a different crossing — to Canada, to work for the Scottish-Canadian Goldie milling family, who had themselves crossed from Ayrshire to Ontario in 1841. Two brothers, two North American crossings.
• The family record on the Eesley side runs back through John Eesley (b. 1800) and earlier Joseph Eesley in Hanwell, Oxfordshire — itself a small crossing across the county line from Hanwell parish into the Old Stratford address on Rother Street. The willingness to move is documented at every depth of the archive.

The pattern continues in the 20th century, with the same posture but different distances:

• Stella was brought from Hawaii to the Eesley household in Bexley during WWII by Charles Leonard Eesley, explicitly to keep her clear of the West Coast Japanese-American internment camps. She stayed, married, raised her family there, and “sent macadamia nuts back from Hawaii for years.” A wartime crossing, made for the safest version of what’s next.
• Robert Earl Wildermuth left Marietta for Stanford on the GI Bill in 1948 and never lived in southeastern Ohio for long again — the rest of the career took him across Korea, the Pentagon, Itazuke Air Base in Japan from 1965 to 1968, and a string of other postings. His Stanford crossing is the founding instance of moving for education and career in the lineage Chuck would later complete.
• The Zhou-side ancestor Zhou Zhaoxiang made his own intra-Chinese crossing from his birth-city of Jiaozhou Shi to Qingdao — the same pattern of internal migration toward opportunity that Robert Earl made within the United States, run in parallel on the other side of the world.

And in the present generation:

• I went from Marietta to Duke, to MIT, to Stanford — three crossings in fifteen years, each toward the next degree or the next appointment.
• Lijie made the largest single crossing in the contemporary archive: from Qingdao, China to Palo Alto, California, for graduate school and the life we have made together. Her crossing is the same shape as Johann Michael’s in 1847 — a young person leaving the country of birth for a country where the next chapter of life will happen — at a different scale and a different distance.

There is even an interesting inverse case in the lineage. Terrie had spent her own childhood being moved across the U.S. and Japan by her father’s Air Force career — and she chose, deliberately, to stay in Marietta with her own son so that I would have, in her words, “a set of childhood friends.” The crossing impulse runs both ways: sometimes the way you act on it is by refusing it for the next generation’s sake. That refusal was itself a kind of move.

Two things knit the whole thread together. First, every named crossing in the archive was toward a specific opportunity, not for restlessness — a mill, a degree, a wartime refuge, an appointment, a marriage. Second, the crossing impulse and the pilgrimage impulse are not in tension. Every generation in the archive makes a forward crossing, and the next generation goes back to honor it: Johann Michael left Württemberg, Robert Earl returned to Rielingshausen in 1992, I went back again with Lijie in 2018. The Eesleys left Stratford; Lijie and I went back to Hanwell and the Old Stratford address on the 2018 trip. Lijie left Qingdao; we went back to her elementary-school fence and to her parents’ honeymoon temple at Hangzhou together. The forward crossing and the return are the same family practice.

The lesson: when the next thing is not where you currently are, go — and then make sure someone in the next generation knows where you came from so they can come back to it for both of you.

10. Building things — entrepreneurship across four generations (and the present generation as its student)

This is the thread that begins as a literal practice and ends, in this generation, as an academic subject — a turn worth naming explicitly, because the family’s own habit has become the family’s own research program.

The canonical historical instance is John F. Eesley. He bought a roller rink in Plainwell, Michigan in 1887, converted it into a flour mill, and grew it under the Sunshine Brand Flour label into the second-largest producer of buckwheat flour in the United States at its peak — producing up to six hundred barrels a day. In 1903–04 he literally physically divided the timber-frame mill building, moved it to a new site, and merged it with an existing grain elevator. The building is now listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is the only piece of physical Eesley infrastructure that survives into the present. It is the family surname on a building, on a federal register, at the close of a single life’s entrepreneurial work.

On the Wildermuth side, Johann Michael Wildermuth arrived in Marietta in 1847 at sixteen and built up the shoe trade with William Rossar of Baden — a small-town immigrant business that established the family in southeastern Ohio for the next century and a half. The two founding 19th-century moves — Württemberg → shoe trade in Marietta, Stratford → flour mill in Plainwell — share the same shape: arrive, learn a trade, build something that didn’t exist before you got there.

Albert Robert Eesley’s earlier crossing into the Goldie milling business in Ontario is the parallel case — he didn’t found a mill himself, but he went to work for and marry into a Scottish-Canadian milling family that had built one. The milling-and-trade-building pattern runs across both branches of the Eesley line.

The thread continues in the 20th century:

• Will Eesley built two architectural firms — Scott and Eesley first, then Eesley, Lee, Vargo and Cassady — across a career in Marietta. The man literally designed and built buildings for a living, including (off-hours) the Highland Ridge Road house he raised his family in. Architectural practice as a form of entrepreneurship, with the firm itself as the structure being built.
• Charlie Eesley was a stockbroker for The Ohio Company and later Hazlett, Burt & Watson — a self-directed financial profession in which you build your own book of clients over decades. The eulogy quote about Peggy’s investing has its hidden subtext here: Charlie was a broker because his mother had been a serious investor first.
• Peggy McMaster Eesley was the family’s investing strategist before any of these jobs were named — her decades-long, patient capital allocation funded the retirement travel and the next generation’s education. Personal investing as the household-scale version of the same impulse: build a structure that produces returns over a long horizon.

The Zhou-side founder-entrepreneur instance had been provisionally attached, in earlier versions of this essay, to Lijie’s paternal grandfather and an early Qingdao photography studio — but Lijie’s mother, in June 2026, clarified that the studio was actually co-owned by his cousin, not founded or run by him. The Zhou-side founder-entrepreneur slot is therefore open for now — very possibly belonging to the cousin once we have his name and the studio’s identity; possibly to be reassigned to a different Zhou-side figure once Lijie’s father can fill in more detail. What we can say is that mid-century Qingdao’s civic-business history did run partly through the cousin’s studio, and Lijie’s grandfather was inside that world even if he was not its founder. The portrait at the head of his page is now best read as a frame taken inside the cousin’s shop, in front of one of the painted backdrops the studio used, with five-year-old Lijie under his right hand around 1988. The thread — find a craft no one in your city has set up yet, set it up, and run it long enough that the city’s history runs through your shop — still has founding-entrepreneur instances on the Eesley side (John F. Eesley’s Plainwell mill, 1887) and the Wildermuth side (Johann Michael’s Marietta shoe trade, 1847); on the Zhou side the entry is now an open question rather than a closed claim.

And in the present generation, the thread turns reflective in a striking way. I am a Stanford faculty member whose research field is entrepreneurship itself — W. M. Keck Foundation Faculty Scholar in Management Science & Engineering at Stanford University, with published work on entrepreneurship in Japan and elsewhere. The family practice of building businesses — John F. Eesley’s flour mill, Johann Michael’s shoe trade, Will’s firms, Charlie’s brokerage, Peggy’s portfolio — has become, in my own working life, the subject of the family’s academic study.

This is not a coincidence and not a small thing. It is what happens when a thread runs long enough across a family that one generation starts noticing it explicitly and turns it into a research program. There is something Yeatsian about it: how can we know the dancer from the dance? The family has been entrepreneurially building things for two centuries, and the present generation has gone meta on the pattern.

The lesson: build things — businesses, firms, portfolios, mills, photography studios, research programs. The family’s habit has been to make something that didn’t exist before, at whatever scale the generation can manage, and to let it run for as long as it can run. The Plainwell mill is still on the National Register; that is what “as long as it can run” looks like.

---

A closing observation

Reading these ten threads back at the same time, what’s striking is that none of them is unique to one side of the family. Education, patience, documentation, returning to places, service-and-stewardship (now running from the First Congregational endowment to the Zhou & Eesley Family Foundation), humor, daily presence, the Japan-and-China curiosity, the crossing impulse, and the entrepreneurial habit of building things — every one of them is exemplified on the Eesley side, on the Wildermuth/Fleming side, and now on the Zhou side as well. The archive’s structural choice to give a Zhou ancestor the same person-page shape as an Eesley ancestor, to treat Lingyin Temple and Rielingshausen church as the same kind of object, was a values choice before it was a data-model one.

What June 2026 added

The first draft of this essay was written in early June 2026 from the archive as it then stood. Several substantial pieces of new material have come in since — mostly from Roberta Burnes Walker on the Eesley side, and from a careful re-OCR pass through Robert Earl’s combat-log manuscript on the Wildermuth side. None of them changes the ten threads above, but each thickens one of them:

• Thread #3 (writing things down) — the Big One crew-roster page was OCR-recovered, surfacing five crew members who had been only names or were absent from the archive: Maxwell Van Valen the MIT-third-year pilot living in Paris after the war, Lyle Pound the Kansas-wheat-farm engineer who survived a postwar Caribbean B-29 crash that made the MGM newsreel, Merwin Adler the Buffalo-University bombardier, Charles “Charley” Boyt the eighteen-year-old nose gunner from Buffalo, Milton Emkow the Columbus-Wisconsin armament supervisor, and Orland Young the Coldwater-Ohio top turret gunner. Robert Earl had named them all and given each a sentence-or-two character note in his 1989 typewritten manuscript — the writing-down was already done; the work was to read it.
• Thread #5 (stewardship and chosen family) — the 1953 Hawaii anniversary trip photograph surfaced from Roberta’s keeping. Charles Leonard and Lillie Dale wearing welcome leis on a ship’s deck in Honolulu Harbor with Stella standing between them — the visual capstone of the 1942 wartime decision to bring Stella from Hawaii into the Bexley household. The Bexley-Honolulu kinship the war began was complete enough by 1953 that the Eesleys’ 50th wedding anniversary was held there.
• Thread #7 (showing up) — the Black Lake, Michigan cottage emerged as a major piece of the family’s “showing up” infrastructure across the 1920s through 1950s. Every Eesley summer ran through the lake; the cottage was “the gathering place for all Eesleys” until it burned down sometime in the 1950s. the summer Dale and his young sister Helen swapped Charles Leonard’s false teeth for a junk set from an abandoned boat and set off his “Consarn it!” across the water; the Reveille record a brother flung into the lake; the Chief Whitecloud character he played by canoe at the children’s campfires — these are now in the archive as the small texture of a place the family kept showing up to. It is the same place that took Dale on 14 July 1939, on an errand across the water. The family went back anyway, summer after summer — showing up sometimes means carrying on after a loss you cannot undo.
• Thread #9 (crossing) — six new place pages now anchor Robert Earl’s Pacific tour as a single forward-crossing arc: Canton Island (the mile-long Phoenix-group atoll where the $50 whiskey bottle traded hands), Mokmer Drome at Biak, Peleliu Air Field, Leyte Air Field at Tacloban, McGuire Field, Mindoro, and Ie Shima. Travis AFB → Honolulu → Canton → Biak → Peleliu → Tacloban → Mindoro → Sydney (R&R) → Saigon (one mission) → Canton (China, one mission) → Ie Shima → Nagasaki → McClellan → Wright-Patterson, 14 November 1944 through 30 November 1945. The crossing is itself the line that runs from Marietta to Stanford in 1948 and reappears as the present generation’s Marietta-to-Stanford line eighty-plus years later.

The threads above are what the family has actually been passing down. The archive is the latest instance of one of them — thread #3, the writing-things-down-for-future-people — being practiced again. The hope, in the line Robert Earl left at the end of his last manuscript, is that whoever reads this in another generation will recognize themselves in some of it, and add their own.

Written by Chuck Eesley, June 2026 — a synthesis pass across the existing archive. Each thread is anchored to specific people, documents, and places. The pages those anchors point to are the underlying record; this essay is the cross-reading.

---

中文 — 家族的十条线索

一个人若不知自己来自哪里，又怎能说自己要往哪里去？

— 罗伯特·厄尔·维尔德穆斯，《维尔德穆斯-弗莱明家族史》扉页题辞，1990年1月1日

这篇文章想做什么

本档案中大部分的内容是 “是什么” — 姓名、日期、地点、照片、越南家书、悼词、回忆录、家族相册。下面想做的，是一次 “为什么” 的尝试：对整个档案做一次横向阅读，把跨页面、跨代际反复出现的价值观、做法和教诲挑出来 — 也就是说，整理出这个家族实际传承下来的那几条线索。

方法上的说明：下面写到的每一条线索，都不是对每位家族成员个人的论断。每一条之所以被列出，是因为在本档案中至少有三代人的证据都指向它；而且重要的是那种”模式”，而不是任何单一的具体事件。线索的顺序，是我反复阅读档案后觉得最自然的顺序，不是按重要性排列。

一、教育是结构性的遗产

档案里被援引最多、跨代证据最清楚的一条线索。我的外祖父 罗伯特·厄尔·维尔德穆斯 凭《退伍军人权利法案》在 1948年10月获得斯坦福大学生物科学学士学位 — 这是家族中的第一个斯坦福学位。他把对教育的这份重视，带过了在五角大楼的整个职业生涯，带进了退休后的家谱研究里，也明确地传给了他的子女。当我母亲 特丽 在学费问题尚未谈妥之前，就替我答应了杜克大学的录取，她说的那句 “别担心，我会有办法的” — 这是同一条线索的下一代写法。2009年的麻省理工博士学位 是这条线索的下一个书签；目前的书签则是我的斯坦福教职。在我这一代里，我的表妹 布丽安娜·（马萨罗）·洛克特 — 我外祖父罗伯特·厄尔最小的女儿 黛比 的女儿，也就是他的外孙女 — 是斯坦福医院的一位临床医生助理（PA）。这把外祖父的两个孙辈，放在了他1947年开着一辆二手1939年旧车初次抵达的同一个校园里。 同一个家族在斯坦福的三代人，跨越七十多年。他回忆录里那一句 “从未感到自卑”，最终竟成了一段长程的预言。在伊斯利一侧：我的祖母 佩姬·麦克马斯特·伊斯利 十七岁进宾州州立大学，1936年毕业，在玛丽埃塔高中教家政。她那份 投资上的智慧 “为我的教育掏了一大半的费用”，这是我在 给父亲的悼词 里的原话。在周家这一侧：周丽婕 也找到了斯坦福；我在清華園门口的留影 是这条线索在中国一侧的对应画面。

家族传下来的不是 “要念书” 这一句话。传下来的是 — 教育是一份结构性的遗产：是一代人用钱、用时间、用耐心把它建立起来，让下一代可以把它当作理所当然的事。

二、耐心，和长期主义，作为一种道德实践

最清晰的表述出现在祖母佩姬的投资上：“她在投资上的智慧、远见和耐心，启发她儿子去做股票经纪人，资助了我祖父母的退休旅行，并为我的教育掏了一大半的费用。” 悼词里说得直白：她是家里的精神支柱。但这种模式比”投资”要宽得多。佩姬晚年在 桥牌牌桌上下的耐心和谋略，是麦克马斯特家族那种”沉得住气”在纸牌上的体现。我外祖父罗伯特·厄尔长达十八年的家谱研究（1971–1989），是这一脉络在历史研究上的对应：他给马尔巴赫、普莱代尔斯海姆、里林斯豪森三座符腾堡村镇的市长写信，得到三个否定的答复；转向盐湖城的耶稣基督后期圣徒教会档案库，找到了第四座村庄；又写信给那位市长；市长把信转给了一位市谱牒研究者；研究者从教区档案里确认，约翰·迈克尔·维尔德穆斯出生于格罗斯阿斯巴赫。接着是长达三年的费城往返通信，直到1986年8月一封意外来信告诉他，那份归化文件实际归档于纽约，而非费城。十八年的来往书信，最后变成了1990年1月1日装订成册的一本印本，扉页献给他的父母与妻子。母亲特丽在玛丽埃塔市学区一干 二十三年，下班后做完饭还熬夜备课，是这种实践在课堂上的展开。父亲做股票经纪的几十年。祖父威尔做建筑的几十年。我自己读博读了十几年，现在又是在慢慢把这个档案建起来。

更深层的教诲不是”复利能赚大钱”。更深层的是 — 慢的事，做对了，做得够久，才是真正改变一个家族走向的东西。钱是一种刻度。教育是另一种。家谱研究是。教书是。桥牌也是。

三、把事情写下来，因为将来一定会有人需要知道

我外祖父在他最后一本手稿的结尾，专门对”未来的家谱研究者”说话 — 这一句，几乎比档案中任何一句都更清楚地说出了，家族其他人这些年实际上一直在做的那件事是什么。他的 回忆录 和 战斗日志 是最经典的例子。但这条线索远不止他一个人。我的姑奶奶 玛丽·伊斯利·宾 写了 1985年的伊斯利家族谱，那是本网站整个家族关系框架的脊梁。我的姑姑 玛吉·伊斯利 整理了 “伊斯利家族四代人” 那部照片合集，成为本档案父系一侧的图像层。我的祖父 威尔·伊斯利 用建筑师的手，画了 1942年配给券圣诞贺卡 和宾姑奶奶那本家族史的封面。我母亲 特丽 把父亲在 越南的家书 留了下来 — 如果她不保存，那一整批信件就根本不存在。我现在做的是这个网站。每一代人，都按自己那代人能用的方式，给下一代做出了一份记录。把这件事称作 一种价值观 — 而不只是一种习惯 — 是为了让我们这一代正在做的档案工作，被看成是这条延绵不断的家族实践的下一段。

教诲是：正在生活的这一代，欠下一代一份记录 — 记录用什么形式，远没有”做了”这件事本身重要。

四、回到那些有分量的地方 —— 把”朝圣”当作家族形式

我外祖父 1993年11月对里林斯豪森和马尔巴赫的朝圣 是这条线索的奠基事件 — 他回到了一百多年前家族离开的那两个德国小镇，带回了照片，也带回了一份打字记下的”回去看看”游记。二十六年后，我和丽婕回到同样的村庄，把我外祖父当年被那位执勤的老太太吓退的那张教堂内景，补拍了。同一年，我们也在伊斯利一侧完成了 汉韦尔和老斯特拉特福的回访；2019年，我和丽婕在 杭州灵隐寺的山门前 拍下了与1982年丽婕父母亲蜜月照同一构图的合影 — 三代人，同一道门。再往前看，1965年我外祖母多蒂带着她的四个孩子 在斯坦福校园返访，在白氏纪念喷泉前合影 — 那是同一模式更早的一例，那时候我们这一辈还没出生。

整个档案的 “今与昔成对照” 结构 — places/ 集合里每一个地点页面在数据架构里都有一个 pairs 字段，正是为这件事而设的 — 是这条线索在网站架构上的表达。回到那些地方是这家族在做的事；档案不过是把这件事固化为一个数据字段而已。

教诲是：回去看看本身就是一种纪念，机票钱花得值。

五、服务、托管、与给予 —— 公民的、军事的、有信仰底色的，几十年如一日，到了我们这一代又走向了双边

这条线索其实有两个面，但其实是同一种实践。时间这一面，叫做”服务”：把自己的时间花在自己家庭之外的机构上。资源这一面，叫做”托管”：照管那些首先不属于自己的钱、关注、和有信仰底色的结构。这两面在家族的记录里，几乎总是一起出现，所以我把它们写成同一条线索。

兵役那一面，是被援引最多的一个维度。我外祖父罗伯特·厄尔·维尔德穆斯 在1944到1945年间，驾驶 B-24 重型轰炸机飞过比亚克、莱特、民都洛的天空，战后回国念完斯坦福，又服役于朝鲜，又服役于五角大楼，最后以中校军衔退役。我父亲查尔斯 在1969年被派往 西贡，1971年轮换回国；那一年塑造了他余下的整个人生。我的二叔祖 莱尔·伊斯利 在1942年作为战俘，死于菲律宾卡帕南死亡营。

公民服务那一面，更宽，也更持久。我的祖父 威尔·伊斯利 在玛丽埃塔市的城市绿化委员会和建市两百周年纪念委员会任职，曾任基瓦尼俱乐部主席，也在贝齐·米尔斯顾问董事会任职。祖母 佩姬 活跃于美国姐妹会、贝齐·米尔斯俱乐部、少年读书会。我母亲 特丽 在玛丽埃塔市学区教了 二十三年，夏天还要兼办”安全城” — 在这一脉里，这是最接近”把公民服务当成事业”的一种形态。

有信仰底色的托管那一面，沿着 玛丽埃塔的第一公理教会（First Congregational United Church of Christ）展开 — 这是一座跨越四代、一直作为家族精神之家的机构：

• 威尔多年在教会的事务委员会任职 — 建筑师的手，应用于教会的行政生活。
• 佩姬长期担任教会的宗教教育主任，是 Dana Philathia Class 的成员，做了很多年 — “信仰与教育”这个连接在她这里最直白：她负责的，是教会教育孩子们的整套课程。
• 我父亲查理在教会董事会任职，协助管理教会的捐赠基金 — 他把股票经纪人的手，带到了教会的金融生活里，用从母亲那里学来的投资纪律，去打理一笔不属于他自己、也不应当属于他自己的资金。这就是字面意义上的”托管”：照管一件你并不拥有的东西。他还*“坚信投票是公民的责任”* — 这是同一种姿态在公共生活面上的对应。
• 我父亲查理的追思礼拜 就在同一座第一公理教会的圣殿里举行，由琳达·斯蒂尔曼牧师主持 — 也就是近十年前为佩姬主持过追思礼拜的同一位牧师。这座家族多年来”给予”的所在，也是家族失去亲人时被点名追忆的所在。

查尔斯·伦纳德·伊斯利 在二战期间 把 Stella 从夏威夷接到俄亥俄州贝克斯利的家中 这件事，也属于这条线索 — 这是一个有信仰底色的、无私的庇护行动，对象是一位与他没有血缘关系、却在美国西海岸面临真实危险的年轻人。对另一条人命的托管。“许多年里都从夏威夷往回寄夏威夷果” 是这条线索从她那一端讲完的部分。

到了我们这一代，同样的实践已经走向了全球，并且变成了双边。丽婕和我在2021年1月创办了 周-伊斯利家族基金会 — 一个私人家族基金会，资助 被主流项目忽略的社区中的计算机科学和创业教育。基金会的承诺写得非常直白：“跟随合作伙伴，而不是套用模板。我们做支持，不做掠夺。我们既给资助，也做投资。” — 正是父亲当年为玛丽埃塔下一代会众，打理教会捐赠基金时的那种姿态，只是范围更大了。

五年下来，工作已经覆盖了八个社区 — 毛伊群岛的莫洛凯、台湾、越南、马来西亚、坦桑尼亚、乌干达、耶路撒冷的 MIT MEET 项目，以及最早合作的 旧金山州立大学 — 加上更近期加入的 巴黎 和 菲律宾。仅2025年的槟城项目，培训了约 25 位教师，他们再把所学带回各自教室，触达约 2,500 名学生，师生比放大了 100 倍。加上我们在斯坦福和线上课程的覆盖，两位联合创始人合计触达过 20 万以上的全球学生。

底层逻辑上的延续性是清楚的，即便机构形式翻译成了另一种：

• 信仰这件事，在伊斯利那几代是公理派基督教 — 一种具体的传统，一栋具体的圣殿。到了我们这一代，信仰的范围更宽了：信仰教育本身是最持久的那种无私给予，跨越宗教、跨越政治分界（耶路撒冷的 MEET 项目把以色列和巴勒斯坦的中学生聚到一起；坦桑尼亚、马来西亚、越南、乌干达的项目跨越了当地家庭实际信奉的每一种主要宗教）。
• 托管这件事，在伊斯利那几代是教会的捐赠基金 — 把你不拥有的钱，向着你所服侍的机构的长期福祉去打理。基金会把同样的实践运行到了更宽的范围里：项目相关投资与资助并行，“跟随合作伙伴，而不是套用模板”。
• 无私的奉献在伊斯利那几代，是佩姬一年又一年为教会的孩子们上课，是查理一届又一届在教会董事会任职，是威尔一年又一年在事务委员会出席。在我们这一代，它是 丽婕正在带的、为期四个月的 ASPIRAS AI 同伴学习项目，与十五家马来西亚非营利组织合作；是 “与在一线做事的人，建立长期关系”；是基金会明文写出的承诺 — “做支持，不做掠夺” — 不去给那项工作贴上自己的品牌，不去抢功。

在维尔德穆斯一侧，外祖父罗伯特·厄尔以另一种方式表达了同一种冲动：他退休后教书、做家谱研究，把这一脉追溯回十八世纪初的符腾堡 — 是一种无报酬的、对家族记录本身的托管 — 对象不同，但给予而不要求回报的那种姿态，是一样的。

基金会的口号 — “把教育送到最需要它的地方” — 几乎可以是佩姬当年在第一公理教会写下的同一句话，只是被放大了几个数量级，又被做成了双边。

教诲是：你欠这个更大的世界，一部分自己的时间，也欠它一部分你被托付的东西 — 形式不一定是华盛顿越战纪念墙上的那一条名字。它可以是教会的捐赠基金、夏天的安全城、建市两百周年委员会、一张选票、一家基金会、一期为期四个月的学员计划。你手上的资源 — 钱、时间、关注、信仰 — 是那些你已经无法报答的人，托付给你的。报答他们的方式，是把你手上的东西，传给那些同样无法报答你的人。

六、幽默 —— 尤其是干涩的、在艰难处境里的那种 —— 是家族传下来的东西

祖母佩姬那种 “暗黑、干涩的幽默感直接传给了她儿子查尔斯，他又以稀释过的版本传给了” 我 — 这是档案里唯一一处把某一具体性格特质明确写成跨代际传承的记录，而它就在 给父亲的悼词 里、用我自己的话写出来。我父亲在西贡时那些 “差一点让他上军事法庭的怪话”，是这种幽默在战区的版本。我自己那句 “所以我只能去当大学教授 — 那儿对幽默的门槛足够低”，是它在学术圈的版本。祖母 佩姬的讣告 结尾纪念的是 “她乐观的人生态度和总挂在脸上的微笑”。我母亲那首 《别为我哭泣》八行诗，用八行字、用从容和幽默面对死亡。

模式是同一个：幽默，尤其是干涩的幽默，是这个家族应对艰难处境的主要工具 — 战争、病痛、父母亲生命的最后阶段、活着这件事本身那些难为情的部分。它不是回避，它是 — 当感伤会显得做作的时候，关心这件事，在这个家族里所采取的形式。

教诲是：在葬礼上开个玩笑是被允许的，而且大概也是应该的。

七、出现 —— 在那些小的、日常的、不光鲜的事上

这条线索得读很多页才能看出来，因为没有任何一个单独的事例称得上”戏剧性”。父亲在祖母 生命最后那段时间，每天下班后都去哈玛之家看她，喂她吃饭。我整个童年，每天放学都去祖母家做作业，每周和父亲一起在祖母家吃一两次晚饭。战时 Stella 从夏威夷被接到伊斯利家，让她远离西海岸的日裔拘留营 — 她留了下来，嫁给了泰德，把 SueLynn 和一个儿子养大，“许多年里都从夏威夷往回寄夏威夷果”。母亲 讣告里点名提到的沃尔夫一家，被称作 “因为长年款待来访亲眷而成为亲人的人”。海兰岭路上的阿诺德一家 住在一百码外，但 “实际上比那近一千倍” — 父亲被拖拉机翻压在身下的那一次，约翰·阿诺德是第一个赶到的人。

模式是 — 亲缘是一种实践，而不是一种身份。在这个家族里”算数”的那些人，之所以算数，是因为那些一起吃过的晚饭、那些放学后的几小时、那些医院里的探望、那些从夏威夷一年寄一次的夏威夷果、那位拖拉机翻倒时来帮忙的邻居 — 不是因为血缘本身。

教诲是：有规律地出现在你所爱的人面前，你所爱的人就会扩展到那些你坚持出现在身边的人。

八、地方与语言，作为一种长期的、跨代际的好奇心 —— 日本与中国

第七条说的是”和谁”。这一条说的是”在哪里”。这个家族，跨越了至少三代，反复回到同样的两个国家 — 日本和中国 — 而且不是以游客的身份，而是作为居住者、学生、语言学习者、研究者、姻亲。这种模式比”度假”要持久得多，已经构成了真实的文化承诺。

在日本这一面，线索清晰地穿过三代人，在 我自己的人物页 上有明确记载：

• 我外祖父罗伯特·厄尔和外祖母多蒂在 1965到1968年间驻在福冈板付空军基地 — 这三年的驻日任期，既成就了我外祖父职业生涯里最重要的一次中队整顿，也让我母亲 特丽 度过了她2017年讣告里写到的那段高中时光：“特丽走遍了美国和日本，直到高中毕业。” 她那张 日本高中毕业照 是那段童年的收尾画面。
• 在伊斯利一侧，我祖父祖母也都去过日本。当沃尔夫家和伊斯利家初次见面（大约是我父母谈恋爱的时候），话题之所以会落到日本，是因为四位长辈都去过那个国家，对它都有共同的兴趣。日本是两个准亲家家庭之间最早的一道共同文化纹路。
• 我自己 每年夏天在神户大学教一周课，也 发表过关于日本创业生态的研究。这是这份持续了六十年的兴趣，在第三代人身上的延续。

在中国这一面，线索还更年轻，但走的是同一个方向。丽婕生于 青岛 — 这座1898年由德意志帝国规划建造的黄海港口城市 — 在德国租界区长大，小学校门口走两步就是 圣弥厄尔大教堂。丽婕的父亲 和丽婕的母亲在1982年的杭州灵隐寺蜜月 是周氏一侧最重要的朝圣画面；她和我2019年回去了，在 同一道门前拍下了对应画面，我自己也在另一次北京之行中，在 清華园主校门 留了影 — 这是我斯坦福教职在中国一侧最接近的对应。本档案中所有周氏一侧的页面，都带有 中文 段落 — 让家族记录本身就是双语的、而不是事后补译，这是同一种价值观在数据结构层面上的写法。

两个国家，日本一侧三代人，中国一侧两代人，姿态在两边是一样的：家族是把这两个地方当作住所，而不是当作景点。它们在家族的生活里不是外国，它们是第二、第三个家。

教诲是：当你不停地回到世界上的同一个角落，世界其实是个小得多的地方；而推动你不停回去的那份好奇心，会像祖母佩姬的投资那样，跨代际地复利下去。

九、跨越 —— 为了”下一步”而迁徙，跨越大洲，跨越代际

这是第四条线索（朝圣）的结构对偶项。朝圣那条说的是回去；这一条说的是往前去。 两者在档案的每一代里都同时存在，两者都是价值观，不是相互矛盾。

家族的记录，字面上是从”迁徙”开始的：

• 约翰·迈克尔·维尔德穆斯 于 1847年，十六岁 时，从符腾堡王国的格罗斯阿斯巴赫启程，远渡重洋 — 这一点在他自己1853年于费城申请归化美国国籍的那份请愿书上写得清清楚楚。他在玛丽埃塔做制鞋这一行，葬于橡树林公墓。他是那个离开了的维尔德穆斯。
• 约翰·F·伊斯利 在十九世纪从 沃里克郡的老斯特拉特福 渡海到美国，并在那次跨越的尽头 创办了 密歇根州普兰韦尔的阳光面粉厂，把家族的姓氏列上了美国国家史迹名录。他的兄弟 阿尔伯特·罗伯特·伊斯利 则做了另一种跨越 — 去了加拿大，给苏格兰裔加拿大的戈尔迪面粉家族打工 — 后者本身是1841年从苏格兰艾尔郡跨海到安大略的。两兄弟，两次横跨北美的迁徙。
• 伊斯利一侧的家族记录还能上溯到 约翰·伊斯利（生于1800年） 和更早的 约瑟夫·伊斯利（在牛津郡的汉韦尔）— 那本身就是一次小的跨越，从汉韦尔教区跨过郡界，迁到了 罗瑟街上的老斯特拉特福地址。愿意搬迁这件事，在档案的每一层深处都有记录。

在二十世纪，这条线索继续着，姿态相同，距离不同：

• Stella 孙 在二战期间被 查尔斯·伦纳德·伊斯利 从夏威夷接到俄亥俄州贝克斯利的伊斯利家中，明确是为了让她远离美国西海岸的日裔拘留营。她留下来，结了婚，养大了一个家，“许多年里都从夏威夷往回寄夏威夷果。” 一次战时的跨越，为的是”下一步”中最安全的那种版本。
• 罗伯特·厄尔·维尔德穆斯 1948年凭《退伍军人权利法案》离开玛丽埃塔，去了斯坦福，后来再也没在俄亥俄东南部长住过 — 余下的人生把他带到了朝鲜、五角大楼、1965到1968年间的福冈板付、以及一连串的其他驻地。他的斯坦福跨越，是”为了教育和事业而搬迁”这条家族线索中的奠基事件，多年后我自己完成了它的对应版本。
• 在周氏一侧，丽婕的爷爷 也完成了自己在中国境内的迁徙 — 从他的出生地胶州市，进了 青岛 — 这与我外祖父在美国境内的迁徙模式相同，是同一种”为机会而迁徙”，在世界的另一头并行展开。

到了现在这一代：

• 我从玛丽埃塔到 杜克，到 麻省理工，到 斯坦福 — 十五年里三次跨越，每一次都是为了下一个学位或下一个职位。
• 丽婕 完成了当代档案里规模最大的一次单一迁徙：从中国青岛到加州帕罗奥图，为了研究生学业，也为了我们现在共同生活的这一切。她的跨越，与1847年约翰·迈克尔的那一次形状相同 — 一个年轻人，离开了出生的那个国家，去到一个下一段人生即将展开的国家 — 只是距离不同，规模不同。

档案里还有一个有意思的反向案例。我母亲 特丽 自己的童年就是被父亲的空军职业不停地搬来搬去 — 她有意识地选择留在玛丽埃塔，让她的儿子（也就是我）能够用她自己的话说 — “有一组从小一起长大的朋友。” 跨越的冲动其实是双向的：有时候，你对它的回应方式，正是为下一代人主动拒绝它。这种拒绝本身，也是一种迁徙的姿态。

把整条线索串起来的有两点。第一，档案中每一次被点名的跨越，都是奔着一个具体的机会去的 — 一座面粉厂、一个学位、一个战时避难所、一个驻地任命、一桩婚姻 — 不是为了浪游本身。第二，跨越的冲动和朝圣的冲动不是相互冲突的。档案里每一代都做了一次向前的跨越，而下一代都回去致敬：约翰·迈克尔离开了符腾堡，外祖父罗伯特·厄尔1993年回到里林斯豪森，我和丽婕2018年又回去了一次。伊斯利一家离开了斯特拉特福；丽婕和我2018年回到汉韦尔和老斯特拉特福地址。丽婕离开了青岛；我们一起回到了她小学的栅栏前，回到了杭州她父母亲蜜月时去过的那座寺庙。向前的跨越，和回头的朝圣，是同一种家族实践。

教诲是：当”下一步”不在你现在所在的地方时，去 — 然后保证下一代里有人知道你是从哪里来的，这样他们才能替你也替他们自己，回去看看那个地方。

十、造东西 —— 跨越四代的创业实践（到了这一代，又成了它自己的研究对象）

这条线索一开始是字面意义上的”动手做事”，到了我们这一代，变成了一门学术研究的对象 — 这个转向值得专门点出来，因为家族自己的习惯，变成了家族自己的研究课题。

历史上最经典的一例，是 约翰·F·伊斯利。他在1887年买下了密歇根州普兰韦尔的一个旱冰场，把它改造成一座面粉厂，用”阳光牌”面粉这个品牌，把它做成了当时全美第二大荞麦面粉生产商 — 高峰时一天能产六百桶面粉。1903到1904年间，他干脆把那座木结构厂房整个切开、整体搬迁，再与一家既有的粮仓合并。这座建筑现在 列入了美国国家史迹名录，是伊斯利家族姓氏在美国留下的、唯一一栋仍然存在的实体建筑遗产 — 是家族姓氏，在联邦的史迹名录上，写在一栋建筑物上面，作为一辈子创业工作的收尾。

在维尔德穆斯一侧，约翰·迈克尔·维尔德穆斯 于1847年，十六岁抵达玛丽埃塔，与巴登来的威廉·罗萨尔一起，建立起了制鞋的生意 — 一桩小镇移民式的小生意，但这桩生意把这家人在俄亥俄东南部一扎扎了一个半世纪。两次十九世纪的奠基性”跨越加创业” — 从符腾堡到玛丽埃塔的制鞋作坊，从斯特拉特福到普兰韦尔的面粉厂 — 形状是一样的：到了一个新地方，学一门手艺，做出一件你来之前还不存在的东西。

阿尔伯特·罗伯特·伊斯利 早年迁入 安大略的戈尔迪面粉生意 也是同一种平行案例 — 他自己没有创办面粉厂，但他是去为一家苏格兰裔加拿大的面粉家族打工，并最终娶进了那家 — 那家本身就是一个创业家族。“做面粉/做生意”的这条线，在伊斯利家两边的支脉上都有。

到了二十世纪，这条线索继续走：

• 威尔·伊斯利 在玛丽埃塔的一辈子，先后办了两家建筑事务所 — 先是 Scott and Eesley，后是 Eesley, Lee, Vargo and Cassady。这位先生靠”画建筑、建建筑”为生，包括（下班后）他亲手设计建造的、抚养自己一家人长大的 海兰岭路那栋房子。建筑师事务所的合伙人结构，本身就是一种创业 — 公司本身，是他造出来的”建筑”。
• 查尔斯（查理）·伊斯利 在俄亥俄公司（The Ohio Company）和后来的 Hazlett, Burt & Watson 做股票经纪人 — 这是一种”自己掌舵”的金融职业，几十年里要靠自己一个客户一个客户地把”业务簿”做出来。悼词里那句关于祖母佩姬投资的话，背后有一层潜台词：父亲之所以做股票经纪人，是因为他母亲在他之前就已经是个认真的投资者了。
• 佩姬·麦克马斯特·伊斯利 比上述任何一份职业都更早，她就已经是这个家族最早的投资策略师 — 她那种几十年如一日的、耐心的资本分配，资助了祖父母的退休旅行，也资助了下一代的教育。把个人理财做成”家庭层面的创业”：搭建一个可以长期产出回报的结构。

这篇文章早先的版本，曾把周家一侧的”奠基性创业者”一例归于丽婕的爷爷，与青岛早期一家照相馆相连。2026年6月，丽婕的母亲澄清：那家照相馆其实是由丽婕的爷爷的表/堂兄弟共同经营，并非他本人开办或主理。所以”周家的奠基性创业者”这一格，目前是空的 — 很可能等我们知道表兄弟的名字与照相馆的字号后，归到这位表/堂兄弟名下；也可能要等丽婕的父亲补充更多细节之后，重新指认到周家另一位先辈身上。可以确定的是：二十世纪中叶青岛的市井商业史，确有一段从那家表兄弟的相馆里走过；丽婕的爷爷身处那个世界之内，即使他不是那家相馆的奠基人。本人物页页首那张肖像，现在最合理的读法，是摄于表兄弟的照相馆里、影楼绘制的一张布景之前，1988年前后，五岁的丽婕站在他的右手边。这条线索 — 找一门城里还没有人开起来的手艺，把它开起来，然后让它运转得足够久，久到城市的历史也开始从你的店面里走过 — 在伊斯利一侧（约翰·F·伊斯利在普兰韦尔的面粉厂，1887年）和维尔德穆斯一侧（约翰·迈克尔在玛丽埃塔的制鞋作坊，1847年）依旧有具体的奠基者；周家一侧，则是一个有待补完的开放条目。

到了我们这一代，这条线索发生了一个值得专门点出的转向。我自己是 斯坦福的一位教员，研究领域恰恰是创业本身 — 斯坦福大学管理科学与工程系凯克基金会教席学者（W. M. Keck Foundation Faculty Scholar），发表过关于日本创业生态等等的研究。家族这条”造东西”的实践 — 约翰·F·伊斯利的面粉厂、约翰·迈克尔的制鞋作坊、威尔的建筑事务所、查理的经纪业务、佩姬的投资组合 — 在我自己的工作里，变成了家族自己的学术研究对象。

这不是巧合，也不是一件小事。它是当一条家族线索延伸得够久之后，才会自然出现的那种”代际反身性” — 这一代人开始明确地注意到这种模式，并把它写成研究课题。这里有一种叶芝式的味道 — “我们怎么能把舞者从舞蹈中分出来？” 家族在两个世纪里一直在以创业的方式造东西，现在这一代，把这件事本身做成了元研究。

教诲是：造东西吧 — 生意、公司、投资组合、面粉厂、照相馆、研究项目都行。家族的习惯是去做一件你来之前还不存在的事，规模量力而行，然后让它运转得越久越好。普兰韦尔的那座面粉厂还在国家史迹名录上 — “运转得越久越好”长这个样子。

---

一个收尾的观察

把以上十条线索一起放在眼前回看，最打动我的，是 — 没有任何一条是只属于家族某一支的。教育、耐心、记录、回到那些地方、服务-与-托管（这一条现在从第一公理教会的捐赠基金，一路延伸到了周-伊斯利家族基金会）、幽默、日常出现、对日本与中国的好奇、跨越的冲动、“造东西”的创业习惯 — 每一条，在伊斯利一支、维尔德穆斯/弗莱明一支，以及现在的周家一支，都有可对应的例子。本档案在结构上的那个选择 — 把 一位周家的祖辈 处理成与 一位伊斯利祖辈 同样形制的人物页，把 灵隐寺 与 里林斯豪森教堂 视为同一种被纪念的对象 — 是先有了价值观，然后才有的数据架构。

上面这十条线索，是这个家族实际上一直在传的东西。本档案，是其中第三条 — 把事情写下来给未来的人看 — 在我们这一代的又一次实践。我希望，正如我外祖父在他最后一本手稿结尾留下的那句话所盼望的：将来某一代人读到这些时，能在其中认出他们自己 — 并把他们自己的那一份，添上去。

查尔斯·埃里克·伊斯利（恰克）撰，2026年6月 — 对现有档案的一次横向综合阅读。每一条线索都锚定在档案中具体的人物、文档和地点页面上。锚点所指的那些页面是底层记录；本文只是横向的串读。